You are here: Body Confidential › Health.

ALTHOUGH the technology had been around for a while, it wasn't really until the 1980s when microwave ovens really started to become a regular feature in most UK kitchens, offering a quick and easy way to cook and heat food.
Many people hailed it as the best thing since sliced bread (not my favourite loaf form, but that's another story) and manufacturers rushed to provide us with essential utensils, exclusively for use with microwaves, cookery books which demonstrated how to produce entire meals using only the microwave and 'ready meals' specifically designed for re-heating in the microwave.
In fact some enthusiastic advocates went as far as declaring that the microwave was the only piece of equipment that 20th century man and woman needed in the kitchen. Except, presumably, a pair of scissors and a fork.
So, with a few decades-worth of use under our belts, how does microwave cooking compare with conventional cooking?
How does it work?
Essentially, microwave ovens transmit heat via electromagnetic radiation, which travels through the food container and causes water molecules in the food to vibrate and heat up. It's quicker than conventional cooking, which heats the container first and then the food, but it's harder to control how and where heat is directed.
Is it safe?
Is there anything you shouldn't heat in the microwave?
Is it healthy?
Should we be using microwaves?
When weighing up the advantages against the disadvantages, an important consideration is what kind of foods are we heating in microwave ovens? The problem is that, very often, they are used to heat up ready meals, which are often relatively low in nutrients in the first place.
However, in some situations, eg., if you work at a site with limited access to shops and canteen facilities, bringing in a homemade soup and heating it in the microwave may be the only way you can get a decent meal in the middle of the day.
Personally, I prefer to cook using more conventional means. It's tried and tested and there's lots of research that tells me how cooking methods, such as steaming, preserve the nutrient content of foods. I enjoy taking the time to choose and prepare what I am going to eat and I think the food tastes better for it. Even when I'm in a hurry, an omelette and a side-salad or a piece of poached fish with some steamed vegetables takes little more time than bunging something in the microwave and yet the taste and texture is immeasurably better.
The advice given here is not intended to replace medical advice. Always consult your GP if you are concerned about your health.
Clare Jones, BA(Hons), Dip ION, mBANT NTC & CNHC registered
Nutritional Therapy 07985 166606.
If you would like to make an appointment for a personal nutrition consultation with Clare, please contact her on the above number or visit Clare’s website: www.clarejones-nutrition.co.uk
Follow Clare on Twitter @ClareJonesNutri
Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great videos, food reviews, news, deals and savings.
7 comments so far, continue the conversation, write a comment.

Win A Family Pass To Alton Towers Resort
Win A Nars Makeup Masterclass Place And Goody Bag
Win A Fairly Traded Goody Bag
Win £100 Worth Of Brave Soul Clothing
Win A Framed Anime Print
Win Amy Childs’ Lashes
Win A Pair Of Daisy Street Shoes
Win A KeraStraight Style Solution At Trevor Sorbie
Win A Koo-Ture Dress Worth £300
Win Hotel Chocolat’s Eggsibitionist Extra Thick Easter Egg
Read an interesting book "How to cook w/out recipes" (www.amazon.co.uk/…/1906032238…) that advocates microwave cooking.
The book was all about knowing what flavours, textures, etc. go together in order to be more confident and experimental. However, it also praised the microwave for cooking frozen veg, which the author said said was healthier as the nutrients didn't leach into cooking water as normal hob-cooking.
Wouldn't go as far as roasting a chicken, but think its an interesting argument....
There may be some nutritional loss cooking with microwaves but I cannot believe that it is greatly different from conventional cooking.
One key thing hinted at by the article is the time saving but with that comes a significant reduction in the amount of electricity used, and everyone should be looking at ways to do that.
I'm not a food snob and LOVE quick food but everything comes out chewier or drier or soggier in a microwave. I can totally tell the difference. Especially with frozen veg.
Who the hell would microwave frozen veg?
The crazy bitch above!
When my cooker 'died' on me I fed a family of 4 using mainly my microwave for about 2 years. I did have a working hob but found that most things can be cooked successfully in the microwave. I didn't buy any ready meals but cooked most things from scratch. I was glad to get a conventional oven again but managed quite adequately with my microwave and was surprised how versatile it was.
I microwave frozen veg. I stick them in with my potatoes as they both take about the same time. Easy.
Not had one for two and a half years and the only thing I miss it for is popcorn. Pretty much every other foodstuff comes out noticably inferior than cooking it properly and is generally a bit grim.